December 26, 2008
Would you date an oafish, unattractive, whiny person if they were extremely wealthy?
The 5th of November asked:
You have to live in the same house with them and come in contact with them every day but you would get the perks of nice food, health care, clothes, cars, gadgets, vacations, etc.
And no, you do NOT have to have children with them.
P.S. No romantic affairs with other people.
Filed under Gadgets by 
Comments on Would you date an oafish, unattractive, whiny person if they were extremely wealthy?
No. I really don’t get along with oafish, whiny people, attractive or not.
Absolutely not. Life is too short to waste it on someone you don’t adore being with.
No, I wouldn’t. My peace of mind is much more important than any creature comforts. If I wanted to be with a wealthy creep I could be but I turned him down.
no, i couldn’t even do that with a friend let alone date them , ahhh that bugs me now
Hell yeah, as long as they give me access to their bank account, do you know any?
ah…NO
Money doesnt buy happiness just silly stuff…and realistically how much do you really need?
No thanks. What’s the point? I eat nice food already, have free health care, have no need for many clothes, have a car, gadgets etc. I’d like more holidays but not if I had to spend them with the person you’ve just described. Maybe if I was starving and homeless.
So live life without *** so I can have money. I think I’d rather live with someone I like and just get a job would be better.
People ask this question all the time usually in response to a “why do women like jerks question.” The women are all going to respond by telling you that they would never do such a thing. If people were caricatures of themselves, it would be a valid question. The problem with the formula is that people are usually much more complex. Even the biggest “jerks” are only jerks 1/10th of the time. The real question is; how well would you have to be taken care of to offset (x) amount of “offish, unattractive, whiny…” behavior. Since it is a fact that both men and women tend to justify away unattractive attributes in the name of attractive ones. For instance, a woman can be needy, stupid, whiny, b!tchy and rude. However if she has the body of a swimsuit model, men will tend to play down the negatives. Same thing with women. If you are a woman who has no subconscious desire for security and stability (this means you Rio), you are in the vast minority. Studies have shown that these attributes are some of the most powerful attractors for women. Hence, if a man is really wealthy and generous with his wealth women will subconsciously play down his unattractive attributes.
Absolutely not. The wealth would be enough to turn me off.
If they were 93 and had a bad heart.
No. Money is the root of all evil, and I’m not shallow. I like people with a personality, not a huge bank account. By the way, if the oafish, unattractive, whiny person who is very wealthy uses US dollars, they may soon be just an oafish, unattractive, and whiny person seeing as how the value of the dollar is diminishing so rapidly.
No. Not on a tintype.
Don’t care about the money, if they were oafish or if they were unattractive, but whiny would do me in. I already provide everything I need and don’t want much, so not tempted one bit. There is one advantage to having the conservative religious childhood I did, I know I can take care of myself, and prefer it that way.